Sensitive System Access Certification — Siteridgepoint
Facilitated certification cycles for high-risk applications where control owners must confirm, adjust, or revoke entitlements and leave a durable sign-off trail.
Siteridgepoint
We examine who holds elevated rights on your sensitive systems, walk control owners through the evidence, and leave you with an attestation pack you can defend.
Flagship engagement
A structured review of administrator, break-glass, and high-risk entitlements across the systems that matter most to your operations and regulators.
Engagements typically run two to four weeks for a single business unit, with on-site workshops in Nelson Mandela Bay or remote interviews across South Africa.
Related work
Each engagement focuses on entitlements, owners, and evidence—not abstract security frameworks.
Facilitated certification cycles for high-risk applications where control owners must confirm, adjust, or revoke entitlements and leave a durable sign-off trail.
A focused assessment of standing administrator rights, shared privileged credentials, and break-glass accounts, ending with a reduction roadmap tied to real change windows.
Design of a recurring privileged access review cadence—roles, evidence templates, and facilitation habits—so your organisation can run subsequent cycles with less outside help.
From recent clients
“The review mapped every standing admin account on our core banking hosts and gave us a clear attestation pack for the external auditors. The kickoff took longer than we hoped because our asset list was incomplete, but the findings were precise enough that control owners could act without a second round of clarification.”
“We had break-glass accounts that nobody could explain. Siteridgepoint walked each owner through the evidence, not a generic checklist, and left us with a reduction plan tied to our change windows.”
Field notes
Short articles on entitlement extracts, owner facilitation, and evidence that survives audit scrutiny.
What to ask identity and infrastructure teams for so the first workshop starts with usable evidence instead of blank spreadsheets.
Practical ways to keep review workshops focused on decisions rather than debating every historical assignment.